Resolute Square

Key Pete Hegseth Takeaways and How You Stop Him

Of the Pete Hegseth confirmation hearing, Amee writes, "We should be calling it the 'Kavanaugh: The Redux' considering how well Hegseth is able to lie through his smirks, and distract from the real questions at hand with his boisterous Fox News Narratives."
Published:January 16, 2025
Share

Published with the generous permission of Amee Vanderpool. For more of Amee's work, visit her Shero newsletter.

By Amee Vanderpool

I spent all of yesterday morning watching the Pete Hegseth confirmation hearing by the Senate Armed Services Committee and let me tell you, it was painful. We should be calling it the “Kavanaugh: The Redux” considering how well Hegseth is able to lie through his smirks, and distract from the real questions at hand with his boisterous Fox News Narratives.

Pete Hegseth, center, President-elect Donald Trump's choice to be Defense secretary, appears before the Senate Armed Services Committee for his confirmation hearing at the Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, Jan. 14, 2025. (Photo by Alex Brandon/via Getty Images)

In over four hours of testimony, Democrats on the Committee were able to make several salient points about Hegseth’s lack of judgement, experience, and fitness that would make his tenure as Secretary of Defense a dangerous disaster for the United States. I’m going to quickly highlight the strongest arguments against appointing Hegseth here, and include video clips that bolster those arguments. I will also include some tips at the end on how you can make a difference by calling your Senators to object to his appointment, so I ask that you forward this article to everyone you know in an effort to gain awareness and mass participation.

1. Insufficient FBI Background Check

The FBI did not complete a full background check on Pete Hegseth, and instead they worked around issues that could harm him in the hearing process, much like they did with Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. Democratic Senator Jack Reed began the hearings by stating that the background check was “insufficient” as “there are still FBI obligations to talk to people.” Reed also attempted to have more evidence on the testimony of these character witnesses entered into the record by asking for an extended background check. Reed was procedurally denied by Republican Senator and Committee Chair Wicker at every turn.

Ultimately, Senator Blumenthal asked Hegseth directly if he’d be willing to submit to an expanded background check with interviews of former colleagues, ex-wives, “sexual assault survivors and others.”

Hegseth deflected answering by saying: “I’m not in charge of FBI background checks.” Blumenthal also dug into the line of questioning that concerned Hegseth’s financial records and the lack of information the committee had considering the poor performance Hegseth has maintained by bankrupting several organizations.


2. Rape Allegations

The Senate Committee obviously parsed through their many objections to the nomination of Pete Hegseth, and they assigned very specific roles to each US Senator who questioned him in order to highlight his massive mistakes and shortcomings. Senator Tim Kaine questioned Hegseth about the rape allegations and made this essential point: Pete Hegseth is at worst a rapist, and at very best, a man who continually shows poor judgment and a lack of fidelity. Kaine brilliantly pointed out in this portion that we don’t need to rely on the rape allegations, or the domestic violence allegations being true to prove that Hegseth is unqualified to serve as Defense Secretary.


3. Ending “Woke Liberals” for “Warrior Culture”

Hegseth told explained in detail yesterday that Donald Trump’s primary charge to him as Trump is set to take office is: “to bring the warrior culture back to the Department of Defense” and that “he wants a Pentagon laser-focused on war fighting, lethality, meritocracy, standards, and readiness.” The battle lines were drawn again, with Hegseth focusing on past Democratic presidents and their focus on diversity, equity and inclusion. Senator Hirono questioned Hegseth at length about her concern that he was not able to work across the aisle in any capacity and while she was able to emphasize his past statements to that point, she also got Hegseth to admit on the record that he would basically follow any order that Donald Trump gave him, even if it was unlawful.


4. Hegseth’s Blatant Racism and Sexism

Pete Hegseth made obvious and continuous overtures to women and Black troops in his opening statements, in an attempt to roll back criticism of his previous comments that women should “straight up” not serve in combat and his suggestions that some Black troops may not be qualified. Senator Gillibrand made a point to emphasize Hegseth’s demeaning quotes about women in service saying, “You will have to change how you see women to do this job.” Republicans next used Senator Ernst, an Iraq veteran and a survivor of sexual assault, to try and sell the non-existent premise that Hegseth would work hard to enforce Women’s Rights within the military during her allotted time for questioning.


5. Financial Ruin

Pete Hegseth has shown terrible financial judgment in the past. A prime example of this is the two small nonprofit organizations he ran from 2008 to 2016. Under his leadership, funds for Veterans for Freedom took a massive dive, from $8.7 million in 2008 to $265,000 in 2010. Hegseth also took a financial leadership role at Concerned Veterans for America and tax filings show that the nonprofit spent more money than it raised from donations and other charitable gifts avenues during three of the five years he ran the organization.
Ultimately, when a whistleblower report in 2016 accused him of financial mismanagement, Hegseth wrote off the claims as nothing more than a disgruntled employee.

“Your record of gross mismanagement of organizations you previously led raises alarm about your ability to manage a department with a budget of almost $850 billion, which accounts for over half of discretionary federal spending,” Senator Warren concluded during the hearing. Watch Warren work her magic to emphasize the concerning allegations of misappropriation and a lack of complete financial disclosure:


What We Can Do Now

The Armed Services will vote in the near future on whether to advance Pete Hegseth to the Senate Floor for a full confirmation vote. The key to stopping his advancement is to make your objections known at every stage of the process. The first thing you can do is to forward this article to every person you know so that they are informed about the facts and about Pete Hegseth’s lack of character and qualifications. Next, you can contact the Republican Members of the Armed Services Committee, by calling their offices at (202) 224-3121 to demand that they vote “NO” against Pete Hegseth based on his lack of fitness.

If the Pete Hegseth nomination passes and makes it out of committee, I would ask that you stay tuned in order to call your own Senators to demand a no vote once his appointment reaches the Senate Floor. There is still a lot of work to do, and this is not over — Pete Hegseth leading the Department of Defense is too dangerous a proposition to simply overlook his confirmation process. Get involved now!

Related

  • The REAL State of the Union, Part 1
    That Trippi Show

    That Trippi Show

    If you skipped Trump's "State of the Union" record-setting ramble, this show's for you. Joe and Alex dive in - what actually is the state of our union? Part 1 of where we see the world, the economy, and the state of both parties... Starting with how Joe thinks Trump's second term has completely remade American foreign policy. It's Trump and Putin against the world. He answers maybe the scariest listener question to date. And what about here at home? Turns out, when you burn it all down... it takes a REALLY long time for things to grow back.
    March 7, 2025
  • The POTUS Who Cried Mandate

    Punching Up with Maya May

    Trump has no mandate. Full stop. Does he want to pretend he does? You bet! But it’s a bad bet for Trump and he is way overplaying a bad hand. His sinking numbers with the American people on everything from the economy to Elon tell the story. Lisa Senecal, executive editor of Resolute Square, joins Maya May to punch up at a very deserving bully, Donald John Trump, the POTUS Who Cried Mandate. They discuss why Trump’s attempt to show strength in Tuesday's Castro-esque rant before the joint session of Congress was really a huge tell of where he knows he’s weak and failing.
    March 6, 2025
  • The Collapse of Justice and the Rise of Executive Power
    The Enemies List

    Rick Wilson's The Enemies List

    The balance of power in American democracy is being tested like never before. In this episode Rick is joined by legal expert and author Tristan Snell to discuss the latest legal battles surrounding Trump, the Supreme Court’s role in shaping executive power, and the broader implications for American democracy. They break down key cases, including the limits of presidential immunity, the Administrative Procedure Act, and the growing constitutional crisis if Trump defies court rulings. Visit Tristan's Substack at tristansnell.com.
    March 5, 2025
  • Ian Bremmer on Why We're F****d
    The Lincoln Project Podcast

    The Lincoln Project Podcast

    Political scientist, author, and entrepreneur Ian Bremmer -- who's also the founder and president of Eurasia Group and the founder of GZERO Media -- stops by to chat with Rick about how we're fucked, and why we're fucked. There is nothing like sitting down with a good ole expert friend at the beginning of a potential World War to discuss the American economy, AI, global politics, and the growing dangers inside and outside the U.S. democratic government. ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ Follow Ian Bremmer at @ianbremmer on X & @ianbremmer.com on Bluesky Check out more of Ian's work at @eurasiagroup.net and @gzeromedia.com
    March 4, 2025
  • February 28, 2025: The Day America Publicly Embraced Tyranny
    Brian Daitzman writes, "For years, U.S. allies privately acknowledged what had been taboo to say outright: that the United States, under Trump, was falling into autocracy and was no longer a defender of democracy, but an enemy of it." Now, it's all out in public.
    March 3, 2025